Another Excel tracker
- Static rows and fragile formulas
- Manual copy, paste, and follow-up
- Versions spread across inboxes
- Dashboarding constrained by the table
Explore the trade-offs behind a credible plan: capacity, service, cash, and the actions that close the gap.
Interactive demonstrations · Synthetic data · No live company dataTrace a 26-week deployment across multiple suppliers, integration work centers, and two campuses. Test the constraints that determine when racks can enter service.
Multi-echelon model · Alternate sourcing · Power & cooling · Synthetic dataThe plan ends with 144K units unshipped. December is material constrained. Compare the cost and timing of recovery with the customer impact before committing the plan.
Single aggregate product; 12K units opening finished goods; no opening backlog. Backlog carries forward and available inventory ships against oldest demand. Price $820/unit; inventory cost $380/unit. Production = min(material, capacity). Ending inventory = opening inventory + production − shipments. This is volume fulfillment, not an order-level OTIF forecast. No cancellations, lead-time offsets, mix constraints, or production throttling are modeled.
| Month | Demand | Material | Capacity | Production | Shipments | End inventory | End backlog |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | 92 | 85 | 90 | 85 | 92 | 5 | 0 |
| Feb | 99 | 91 | 95 | 91 | 96 | 0 | 3 |
| Mar | 102 | 89 | 93 | 89 | 89 | 0 | 16 |
| Apr | 96 | 93 | 96 | 93 | 93 | 0 | 19 |
| May | 110 | 97 | 102 | 97 | 97 | 0 | 32 |
| Jun | 116 | 103 | 108 | 103 | 103 | 0 | 45 |
| Jul | 123 | 106 | 111 | 106 | 106 | 0 | 62 |
| Aug | 119 | 110 | 116 | 110 | 110 | 0 | 71 |
| Sep | 131 | 112 | 118 | 112 | 112 | 0 | 90 |
| Oct | 139 | 122 | 128 | 122 | 122 | 0 | 107 |
| Nov | 144 | 126 | 133 | 126 | 126 | 0 | 125 |
| Dec | 152 | 133 | 139 | 133 | 133 | 0 | 144 |
A 2D sensitivity chart shows how longer replenishment times increase the buffer needed for uncertain demand.
Reducing lead time from 8 to 6 weeks lowers the modeled buffer by 44 units ($16,720). Compare that inventory release with the cost of faster replenishment.
Safety stock = z × weekly demand standard deviation × √lead-time weeks, rounded up. Variability is standard deviation ÷ average weekly demand. Assumes independent weekly demand, a normal approximation, and constant lead time. Cycle service is the probability of avoiding a stockout in a replenishment cycle; it is not fill rate. Buffer value excludes cycle stock and pipeline inventory. Variable lead times, intermittent demand, and correlated demand need a different model. The three lines compare fixed variability levels; the selected scenario is calculated separately below the chart. The vertical scale adjusts with demand, cost, and service assumptions.
| Lead time | 10% variability | 30% variability | 60% variability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 weeks | 56 | 168 | 335 |
| 4 weeks | 79 | 237 | 474 |
| 6 weeks | 97 | 291 | 581 |
| 8 weeks | 112 | 335 | 670 |
| 10 weeks | 125 | 375 | 750 |
| 12 weeks | 137 | 411 | 821 |
Click any cell to open the underlying risk record: severity, accountable owner, demand exposure, next commitment, and the latest recovery update.
AI can lower the cost of turning an operational idea into a maintained application. The process expert describes the rules, roles, data, and decision; AI helps create the exact interface the work needs.
Operations defines the rules. AI can assist with implementation; data access, validation, and maintenance still need clear ownership.
“Replace the shortage spreadsheet with a live recovery workspace that joins MRP exceptions, demand impact, owners, dates, evidence, and escalation rules.”
Ranked by time to impact × business exposure